I think people focus too much on the typical classifications of socioeconomic classes and top/bottom x%. I believe the following classifications are more helpful:
* Struggling * - struggling (uncertain) to have enough money to fund the basic necessities such as food, shelter, healthcare.
* Stretched * - having enough to fund the basic necessities, but has to watch the budget constantly and make adjustments to purchase certain things.
* Content * - not worried about the basic necessities. Able to purchase some of the things they want, and optimistic about achieving their plans to purchase the other things they want in the future.
* Comfortable * - no worries about money, no budgeting required, working is optional.
* Philanthropist * - People in any class can give to charity because there are always some who are less fortunate than us, but here, I refer to 'philanthropist' as someone who is very 'comfortable' and does not give mainly for tax benefits or having their name on a wall.
The interesting thing about these classifications is that the individual has a lot of control over which class they belong to. Isn't it interesting that some in the upper middle class and perhaps even some from the upper class don't even feel "content" and consider themselves "stretched"? Some have a very warped sense of what are basic necessities and an unlimited appetite for the things they "want" , which are often really just things that others want...so they want them too.
It's also interesting that some who depend on government benefits can feel "content." Some people even think the government should provide enough benefits for people to feel "content" instead of "stretched."
Which class from the above do you belong to?