Since the dawn of this whole Milei shebang, we've been stuck in a wild world of crazy headlines and fake news perceptions like we're living in a reality show where the scriptwriters forgot to include substance. It's all Milei this, DNU that, and Omnibus something else. It's like trying to decipher a secret code, but instead of cracking it, we're all just playing a game of "Milei = Crazy/Evil, DNU = Bad, Omnibus = Unacceptable, Milei = Doomed to fail."
I get it, though. With 664 amendments in the Omnibus package and 366 in the DNU, it's a literary feast that's not exactly light bedtime reading. But hey, assuming people actually bothered to read the rest of the script, wouldn't it be a relief if the most shocking thing about it was judges in black robes? It's like saying, "Oh, look, they're wearing black. How scandalous!" Really, in any other civilized country, this would be the equivalent of a PG-rated plot twist.
Take today, for instance. I had a delightful chat with someone convinced that this whole DNU thingy was anti-LGBT. When I asked for the specific law that was supposedly anti-LGBT, it was like asking a cat to do calculus—blank stares and confusion. Instead, I got an earful about how Milei is the ultimate villain, and we must all join the "resist Milei" movement. Resist what? Beats me. Maybe the resistance is against his perfectly coiffed hair?
If only they knew about and wanted to discuss Article 348 and the potential, albeit indirect, consequences of shutting down INADI. We could have delved into the real issues, like what LGBT rights and liberties are genuinely at risk, and brainstormed some alternatives to INADI. You know, like private local and international NGOs, the judiciary—options galore! But no, according to this mindset, Milei voters are just a bunch of wide-eyed innocents, and it's totally democratic to resist democracy if the outcome doesn't tickle your fancy.
www.pressherald.com
